This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (28) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Woolgar, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Why not a Sociology of Machines? The Case of Sociology and Artificial Intelligence

In the light of the recent growth of artificial intelligence (AI), and of its implications for understanding human behaviour, this paper evaluates the prospects for an association between sociology and artificial intelligence. Current presumptions about the distinction between human behaviour and artificial intelligence are identified through a survey of discussions about AI and `expert systems'. These discussions exhibit a restricted view of sociological competence, a marked rhetoric of progress and a wide variation in assessments of the state of the art. By drawing upon recent themes in the social study of science, these discussions are shown to depend on certain key dichotomies and on an interpretive flexibility associated with the notions of intelligence and expertise. The range of possible associations between sociology and AI reflects the extent to which we are willing to adopt these features of AI discourse. It is suggested that one of the more important options is to view the AI phenomenon as an occasion for reassessing the central axiom of sociology that there is something distinctively `social' about human behaviour.

Sociology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 557-572 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038585019004005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Joerges and B. Czamiawska The Question of Technology, or How Organizations Inscribe the World Organization Studies, May 1, 1998; 19(3): 363 - 385. [Abstract]

				D. Edwards, M. Ashmore, and J. Potter Death and Furniture: the rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism History of the Human Sciences, May 1, 1995; 8(2): 25 - 49. [PDF]

				J. M. Bowers Time, Representation and Power/Knowledge: Towards a Critique of Cognitive Science as a Knowledge-Producing Practice Theory Psychology, November 1, 1991; 1(4): 543 - 569. [Abstract]

				K. Henderson Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 1991; 16(4): 448 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. P. Bloomfield On Speaking about Computing Sociology, August 1, 1989; 23(3): 409 - 426. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. Dutton and J. G. Blumler The Faltering Development of Cable Television in Britain International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, January 1, 1988; 9(4): 279 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF]