Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammersley, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

What's Wrong with Ethnography? The Myth of Theoretical Description

Martyn Hammersley

This paper questions the commitment of ethnography to the goal of producing theoretical descriptions of particular settings, groups or organisations. It is argued that both the concepts of theory and description assumed by this goal are misconceived. Various interpretations of the concept of theory embedded in ethnographic work are examined, revealing some serious difficulties. It is also argued that the concept of ethnographic description, as currently conceived, obscures the role of values and purposes in structuring descriptions. The conclusion reached is that the goals of ethnographic research need rethinking.

Sociology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 597-615 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038590024004003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
C. Hine
Multi-sited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS
Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2007; 32(6): 652 - 671.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
K. Walby
On the Social Relations of Research: A Critical Assessment of Institutional Ethnography
Qualitative Inquiry, October 1, 2007; 13(7): 1008 - 1030.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
S. Gherardi and D. Nicolini
Learning the Trade: A Culture of Safety in Practice
Organization, May 1, 2002; 9(2): 191 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Informatics JournalHome page
B. Hanna
From raw data to chapters via the support of NUDIST
Health Informatics Journal, January 1, 1997; 3(2): 61 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
S. Linsteadl
Objectivity, Reflexivity, and Fiction: Humanity, Inhumanity, and the Science of the Social
Human Relations, November 1, 1994; 47(11): 1321 - 1346.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SociologyHome page
J. D. Brewer
The Ethnographic Critique of Ethnography: Sectarianism in the RUC
Sociology, February 1, 1994; 28(1): 231 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SociologyHome page
S. Porter
Critical Realist Ethnography: The Case of Racism and Professionalism in a Medical Setting
Sociology, November 1, 1993; 27(4): 591 - 609.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
S. Linstead
From Postmodern Anthropology to Deconstructive Ethnography
Human Relations, January 1, 1993; 46(1): 97 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Current SociologyHome page
Bibliographies
Current Sociology, March 1, 1992; 40(1): 167 - 200.