Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Talking about Danger: The RUC and the Paramilitary Threat

John D. Brewer

Ethnographic research on routine policing has shown how danger is a prominent feature of the self-image of members of many police forces, even though the degree of danger faced is not proportional to its centrality. However, members of the RUC face very real life-threatening dangers at work and home. Based on ethnographic research, this paper addresses the question of how policemen and policewomen in the RUC make accountable their feelings about being targets. Three discrete forms of talk about danger were used by them, and the paper identifies the contextual factors which help to occasion and sustain these vocabularies. It concludes by suggesting that these vocabularies are highly structured ways of making accountable feelings about the threat in an occupational culture which otherwise inhibits the expression of emotion; they make reportable the common sense notions, ideas and patterns of behaviour which normalize the threat; and make accountable the manageability of the threat in order thereby to continue with routines which would otherwise be rendered difficult.

Sociology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 657-674 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038590024004006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?