Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Is Britain a Class-Divided Society? A Re-Analysis and Extension of Marshall et al.'s Study of Class Consciousness

Geoff Evans

Marshall et al. have claimed that class is the major social structural influence on social consciousness and ideological conflict in modern Britain. In this paper I re-analyse data from the Essex class study and demonstrate that the class consciousness index devised by Marshall et al. is not an adequate measure of a unitary concept of class consciousness and that their claims about the pre-eminence of class as a structuring influence on identities and attitudes are not supported by the data. My analysis shows that education, income and several other factors influence levels of `class consciousness'. I go on to show that the class consciousness index in-appropriately aggregates diverse types of attitudes and identities, of which only `class identification' has a substantial association with social class. Moreover, class differences in attitudes towards redistribution disappear completely when they involve costs as well as benefits for working class respondents, thus indicating that classes do not differ in their commitment to egalitarianism. In the discussion several responses to the problems encountered in measuring class consciousness in contemporary Britain are examined.

Sociology, Vol. 26, No. 2, 233-258 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038592026002007
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 International SociologyHome page
C. Chung
The New Class and Democratic Social Relations in South Korea: Nascent Moves towards Non-Hierarchical and Participatory Relations
International Sociology, June 1, 2005; 20(2): 225 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SociologyHome page
G. Evans
On Tests of Validity and Social Class: Why Prandy and Blackburn are Wrong
Sociology, February 1, 1998; 32(1): 189 - 202.
[PDF]

Home page
 SociologyHome page
G. Evans
Putting Men and Women into Classes: An Assessment of the Cross-Sex Validity of the Gold Thorpe Class Schema
Sociology, May 1, 1996; 30(2): 209 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Rationality and SocietyHome page
C. MILLS
Rational Choice Marxism and Social Class Boundaries
Rationality and Society, April 1, 1994; 6(2): 218 - 242.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Acta SociologicaHome page
G. Evans
Class, Prospects and the Life-cycle: Explaining the Association between Class Position and Political Preferences
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1993; 36(3): 263 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]