Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Sociology, Vol. 29, No. 1, 95-115 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038595029001007

Deindustrialisation and Dispossession: An Examination of Social Division in the Industrial City

David Byrne

This article reviews the arguments about the possible existence of a spatially segregated underclass in urban industrial contexts in Britain, with reference to the propositions about the nature of the `ghetto poor' advanced in the United States by W. J. Wilson. Data from censuses of population and employment, and from the annual Cleveland Social Survey, are used to explore the nature of changes in the socio-spatial structure and the character of households in a Northern English industrial conurbation. The pattern of socio-spatial division identified for the 1990s is distinguished from that existing in an earlier era of full employment and related to data about school examination success for young people resident in different areas. The study concludes that there has been a major increase in socio-spatial differentiation in this locality which is the product of interaction between deindustrialisation and urban development policies over the postwar period. The product is not an `underclass', but a social formation which looks much more like the sort of industrial reserve army which is particularly suited to the needs of a `post-fordist' system of production.

Key Words: underclass • deindustrialisation • polarisation • locality • socio-spatial • planning


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
S. J Charlesworth, P. Gilfillan, and R. Wilkinson
Living inferiority
Br. Med. Bull., June 1, 2004; 69(1): 49 - 60.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
S. HALL and S. WINLOW
Rehabilitating Leviathan: Reflections on the State, Economic Regulation and Violence Reduction
Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 2003; 7(2): 139 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
J. Mohan
Geographies of welfare and social exclusion
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2000; 24(2): 291 - 300.
[PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
D. Hobbs
Professional Crime: Change, Continuity and the Enduring Myth of the Underworld
Sociology, February 1, 1997; 31(1): 57 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]