This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Holmwood, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Feminism and Epistemology: What Kind of Successor Science?

In this paper, I address recent feminist epistemological claims - in particular, those associated with `standpoint theory' and `feminist postmodernism' - arguing that they share difficulties with other forms of anti-positivist social theory and contribute to an impasse in social inquiry which is becoming increasingly acute. This impasse is traced to the displacement of explanation from the centre of theoretical concerns. In arguing this, I am not, however, proposing a return to positivist social science. The view that explanation can be equated with positivism - that `empirical' equals `empiricism' - is a common misconception. It has led some advocates of a distinct feminist epistemology to describe much research on gender issues as `feminist empiricism'. Such research, they argue, involves a paradoxical or contradictory reliance upon the very `masculine' epistemological criteria which feminist theory has done so much to challenge. In this paper I shall criticise this argument, proposing instead a `post-positivist' position in which empirical research is at the heart of any feminist challenge to mainstream approaches and the reconstruction of social theory.

Key Words: epistemology • feminism • standpoint theory • positivism • post-positivism • postmodernism

Sociology, Vol. 29, No. 3, 411-428 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038595029003003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. J. Fox Practice-based Evidence: Towards Collaborative and Transgressive Research Sociology, February 1, 2003; 37(1): 81 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Luff Dialogue Across the Divides: `Moments of Rapport' and Power in Feminist Research with Anti-Feminist Women Sociology, November 1, 1999; 33(4): 687 - 703. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Rappert The Uses of Relevance: Thoughts on a Reflexive Sociology Sociology, November 1, 1999; 33(4): 705 - 723. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Bottero Clinging to the Wreckage? Gender and the Legacy of Class Sociology, August 1, 1998; 32(3): 469 - 490. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Holmwood Jeffrey C. Alexander Fin de Siecle Social Theory London: Verso, 1995, viii, 231 pp. Craig Calhoun (ed.) Social Theory and the Politics of Identity Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1994, ix, 350 pp. David R. Dickens and Andrea Fontana (eds) Postmodernism and Social Inquiry London: UCL Press, 1994, xi, 259 pp. Irving Louis Horowitz The Decomposition of Sociology New York: Oxford Uni versity Press, 1994, 282 pp. Charles Lemert Sociology After The Crisis Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1995, xx, 252 pp. Nicos Mouzelis Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnoses and Remedies London: Routledge, 1995, xi, 220 pp. Ali Rattansi and Sallie Westwood (eds) Racism, Modernity and Identity on the Western Front Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994, 299 pp. Steven Seidman Contested Knowledge: Social Theory in the Postmodern Era Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1994, xi, 361 pp. Alain Touraine Critique of Modernity Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1995. Trans lated by David Macey, 398 pp. Stephen Park Turner and Jonathan H. Turner The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology Newbury Park: CA, Sage, 1990, 222 pp Journal of Sociology, January 1, 1996; 32(2): 86 - 108. [PDF]