This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (28) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nazroo, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Uncovering Gender Differences in the Use of Marital Violence: The Effect of Methodology

Since the publication of large, representative, structured questionnaire surveys suggesting that women were equally or more likely than men to hit their partners, there has been considerable debate over women's use of violence in marriage. This debate has focused on the methods used to study marital violence. On the one hand, it has been suggested that this female-perpetrated marital violence is a genuine problem which has been uncovered by the rigorous use of representative samples and quantitative methods of data collection. On the other hand, it has been suggested that the use of methods which simply measure acts of physical aggression and ignore the context and meaning of any violence results in the failure to demonstrate very obvious differences between male and female-perpetrated marital violence. This study uses a community sample of couples to show that, although women may hit their partners more often than men do, if context and meaning is included in the assessment of violence, male violence is considerably more likely than female violence to be dangerous and threatening. The data presented also demonstrate that male-perpetrated marital violence is likely to lead to serious injury and greatly increases women's risk of anxiety, whereas female-perpetrated marital violence has neither of these consequences for men.

Key Words: marital violence • Conflict Tactics Scale • anxiety • gender differences • methodology • couples

Sociology, Vol. 29, No. 3, 475-494 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038595029003006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. J. English, J. C. Graham, R. R. Newton, T. L. Lewis, R. Thompson, J. B. Kotch, and C. Weisbart At-Risk and Maltreated Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Aggression/Violence: What the Conflict Looks Like and Its Relationship to Child Outcomes Child Maltreat, May 1, 2009; 14(2): 157 - 171. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Straus Future Research on Gender Symmetry in Physical Assaults on Partners Violence Against Women, November 1, 2006; 12(11): 1086 - 1097. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Hester Future Trends and Developments: Violence Against Women in Europe and East Asia Violence Against Women, December 1, 2004; 10(12): 1431 - 1448. [PDF]

				D. G. Saunders Are Physical Assaults by Wives and Girlfriends a Major Social Problem?: A Review of the Literature Violence Against Women, December 1, 2002; 8(12): 1424 - 1448. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Kimmel "Gender Symmetry" in Domestic Violence: A Substantive and Methodological Research Review Violence Against Women, November 1, 2002; 8(11): 1332 - 1363. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. HAGEMANN-WHITE European Research on the Prevalence of Violence Against Women Violence Against Women, July 1, 2001; 7(7): 732 - 759. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. DiLILLO, D. GIUFFRE, G. C. TREMBLAY, and L. PETERSON A Closer Look at the Nature of Intimate Partner Violence Reported by Women With a History of Child Sexual Abuse J Interpers Violence, February 1, 2001; 16(2): 116 - 132. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. W. BARNETT Why Battered Women Do Not Leave, Part 1: External Inhibiting Factors Within Society Trauma Violence Abuse, October 1, 2000; 1(4): 343 - 372. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Britton Feminism in Criminology: Engendering the Outlaw The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, January 1, 2000; 571(1): 57 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. ARCHER Assessment of the Reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scales: A Meta-Analytic Review J Interpers Violence, December 1, 1999; 14(12): 1263 - 1289. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. P. DOBASH, R. E. DOBASH, K. CAVANAGH, and R. LEWIS Separate and Intersecting Realities: A Comparison of Men's and Women's Accounts of Violence Against Women Violence Against Women, August 1, 1998; 4(4): 382 - 414. [Abstract]