This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fahey, T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Privacy and the Family: Conceptual and Empirical Reflections

This paper offers a critical assessment of the distinction between the public and the private spheres as often used in family studies. In place of the focus on a single public/private dichotomy which is common in sociological usage, it points to the multiple, cross-cutting, context-specific zones of privacy found in social life. It provides an empirical illustration of the nature and effects of such zones of privacy by examining some instances of social policy development in Ireland in the present century where questions of family privacy were very much at issue. It concludes by suggesting that the public/private dichotomy should be understood not as an objective division of the world into two spheres, but as a flexible cultural image which is put to use in wide variety of situations so as to serve a great diversity of interests and purposes.

Key Words: privacy • public sphere • family studies • social policy • Ireland

Sociology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 687-702 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038595029004008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Livingstone Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression New Media Society, June 1, 2008; 10(3): 393 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Tang and X. Dong Parents' and Children's Perceptions of Privacy Rights In China: A Cohort Comparison Journal of Family Issues, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 285 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. G. M. Bailey and N. Caidi How much is too little? Privacy and smart cards in Hong Kong and Ontario Journal of Information Science, October 1, 2005; 31(5): 354 - 364. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Brewer The Public and Private in C.Wright Mills's Life and Work Sociology, October 1, 2005; 39(4): 661 - 677. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. McCarthy and R. Edwards Illuminating Meanings of `the Private' in Sociological Thought: A Response to Joe Bailey Sociology, August 1, 2001; 35(3): 765 - 777. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Bailey Some Meanings of `the Private' in Sociological Thought Sociology, August 1, 2000; 34(3): 381 - 401. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. M. BERARDO Family Privacy: Issues and Concepts Journal of Family Issues, January 1, 1998; 19(1): 4 - 19. [Abstract]

				A. McCulloch On the Public and the Private: A Comment on Fahey Sociology, November 1, 1997; 31(4): 793 - 799. [PDF]