Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (28)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goody, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Inheritance, Property, and Marriage in Africa and Eurasia

Jack Goody

This paper tries to utilize the cross-cultural material presented by G. P. Murdock in the Ethnographic Atlas to analyse the concomitants of differences in the system of inheritance, particularly with respect to the contrast between Africa and Eurasia. In the major Eurasian societies property tends to be distributed directly, from parents to children of both sexes (i.e. by diverging devolution); in Africa property largely devolves between persons of the same sex, laterally as well as lineally. An attempt is made to show the distribution of diverging devolution and its association with the payment of dowry, with monogamy, with in-marriage of various sorts, and with kin terms that differentiate the nuclear family from more distant kin. The tight control of property represented by diverging devolution is in turn seen as deriving from the intensive exploitation of resources which is also linked to the growth of complex political institutions. These associations are tested and held to be established.

Sociology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 55-76 (1969)
DOI: 10.1177/003803856900300104
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cross-Cultural ResearchHome page
C. R. Ember and D. Levinson
The Substantive Contributions of Worldwide Cross-Cultural Studies Using Secondary Data
Cross-Cultural Research, January 1, 1991; 25(1-4): 79 - 140.
[PDF]

Home page
 American Behavioral ScientistHome page
R. R. WILK and W. L. RATHJE
Household Archaeology
American Behavioral Scientist, July 1, 1982; 25(6): 617 - 639.


Home page
 Journal of Family HistoryHome page
D. O. Hughes
From Brideprice To Dowry in Mediterranean Europe
Journal of Family History, September 1, 1978; 3(3): 262 - 296.
[PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
R. Naroll and R. Wirsing
Borrowing Versus Migration as Selection Factors in Cultural Evolution
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 1976; 20(2): 187 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
J. Goody, B. Irving, and N. Tahany
Causal Inferences Concerning Inheritance and Property
Human Relations, August 1, 1971; 24(4): 295 - 314.
[PDF]