Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (37)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Archer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social Integration and System Integration: Developing the Distinction

Margaret Archer

This paper underlines the importance of the distinction between `social' and `system' integration (agency and structure) introduced by David Lockwood in 1964. Its four sections (i) examine the original difficulty of maintaining any distinction between the `parts' of society and its `people' against the social ontology of Individualism whose proponents argued that the former must always be reduced to the latter as individuals were the ultimate constituents of society, (ii) shows how collectivist opposition held `systemic factors' to be indispensable in sociological explanations, but could not substantiate their ontological status against the charge of reification whilst empiricism held sway, (iii) explores how once the individualist/collectivist debate was superseded, Lockwood's distinction was redefined in structuration theory, where insistence on treating structure and agency as mutually constitutive effectively denied their independent variation and thus reduced the `social' and the `systemic' to differences in the scale of social practices; (iv) argues that social realism's ontology, in which `structures' and `agents' belong to different emergent strata of social reality, avoids reducing one to the other or eliding the two. Instead it supplies the ontological grounding for Lockwood's distinction and enables it to be developed into an explanatory programme - analytical dualism - whose central tenet is the need to explore the interplay between these two irreducible constituents of social reality in order to account for why things are `so and not otherwise' and in a manner which is of direct utility to practical analysts of society.

Key Words: Lockwood • social and system integration • social ontology • analytical dualism

Sociology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 679-699 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038596030004004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SociologyHome page
R. Crompton
Forty Years of Sociology: Some Comments
Sociology, December 1, 2008; 42(6): 1218 - 1227.
[PDF]


Home page
Philosophy of the Social SciencesHome page
D. Elder-Vass
Luhmann and Emergentism: Competing Paradigms for Social Systems Theory?
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, December 1, 2007; 37(4): 408 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
F. Vandenberghe
Une ontologie realiste pour la sociologie: systeme, morphogenese et collectifs
Social Science Information, September 1, 2007; 46(3): 487 - 542.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. L. Callahan
Reversing a conspicuous absence: Mindful inclusion of emotion in structuration theory
Human Relations, November 1, 2004; 57(11): 1427 - 1448.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
A. Sturdy
Knowing the Unknowable? A Discussion of Methodological and Theoretical Issues in Emotion Research and Organizational Studies
Organization, February 1, 2003; 10(1): 81 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Social TheoryHome page
R. Stones
Refusing the Realism--Structuration Divide
European Journal of Social Theory, May 1, 2001; 4(2): 177 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
Theorising Social Constraint: The Concept of Supervenience
Sociology, February 1, 2001; 35(1): 159 - 175.



Home page
SociologyHome page
J. Bailey
Some Meanings of `the Private' in Sociological Thought
Sociology, August 1, 2000; 34(3): 381 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
J. M. Domingues
Social Integration, System Integration and Collective Subjectivity
Sociology, May 1, 2000; 34(2): 225 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
R. Willmott
The Place of Culture in Organization Theory: Introducing the Morphogenetic Approach
Organization, February 1, 2000; 7(1): 95 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
M. Zafirovski
Unification of Sociological Theory by the Rational Choice Model: Conceiving the Relationship between Economics and Sociology
Sociology, August 1, 1999; 33(3): 495 - 514.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
M. Perkmann
Social Integration and System Integration: Reconsidering the Classical Distinction
Sociology, August 1, 1998; 32(3): 491 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
K. Healy
Conceptualising Constraint: Mouzelis, Archer and the Concept of Social Structure
Sociology, August 1, 1998; 32(3): 509 - 522.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
C. Shilling
The Undersocialised Conception of the Embodied Agent in Modern Sociology
Sociology, November 1, 1997; 31(4): 737 - 754.
[Abstract] [PDF]