|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Social Integration and System Integration: Developing the Distinction
Margaret Archer
This paper underlines the importance of the distinction between `social' and `system' integration (agency and structure) introduced by David Lockwood in 1964. Its four sections (i) examine the original difficulty of maintaining any distinction between the `parts' of society and its `people' against the social ontology of Individualism whose proponents argued that the former must always be reduced to the latter as individuals were the ultimate constituents of society, (ii) shows how collectivist opposition held `systemic factors' to be indispensable in sociological explanations, but could not substantiate their ontological status against the charge of reification whilst empiricism held sway, (iii) explores how once the individualist/collectivist debate was superseded, Lockwood's distinction was redefined in structuration theory, where insistence on treating structure and agency as mutually constitutive effectively denied their independent variation and thus reduced the `social' and the `systemic' to differences in the scale of social practices; (iv) argues that social realism's ontology, in which `structures' and `agents' belong to different emergent strata of social reality, avoids reducing one to the other or eliding the two. Instead it supplies the ontological grounding for Lockwood's distinction and enables it to be developed into an explanatory programme - analytical dualism - whose central tenet is the need to explore the interplay between these two irreducible constituents of social reality in order to account for why things are `so and not otherwise' and in a manner which is of direct utility to practical analysts of society.
Key Words: Lockwood social and system integration social ontology analytical dualism
Sociology, Vol. 30, No. 4,
679-699 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038596030004004

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Crompton
Forty Years of Sociology: Some Comments
Sociology,
December 1, 2008;
42(6):
1218 - 1227.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Elder-Vass
Luhmann and Emergentism: Competing Paradigms for Social Systems Theory?
Philosophy of the Social Sciences,
December 1, 2007;
37(4):
408 - 432.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Vandenberghe
Une ontologie realiste pour la sociologie: systeme, morphogenese et collectifs
Social Science Information,
September 1, 2007;
46(3):
487 - 542.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Callahan
Reversing a conspicuous absence: Mindful inclusion of emotion in structuration theory
Human Relations,
November 1, 2004;
57(11):
1427 - 1448.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sturdy
Knowing the Unknowable? A Discussion of Methodological and Theoretical Issues in Emotion Research and Organizational Studies
Organization,
February 1, 2003;
10(1):
81 - 105.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Stones
Refusing the Realism--Structuration Divide
European Journal of Social Theory,
May 1, 2001;
4(2):
177 - 197.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Theorising Social Constraint: The Concept of Supervenience
Sociology,
February 1, 2001;
35(1):
159 - 175.
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Bailey
Some Meanings of `the Private' in Sociological Thought
Sociology,
August 1, 2000;
34(3):
381 - 401.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Domingues
Social Integration, System Integration and Collective Subjectivity
Sociology,
May 1, 2000;
34(2):
225 - 241.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Willmott
The Place of Culture in Organization Theory: Introducing the Morphogenetic Approach
Organization,
February 1, 2000;
7(1):
95 - 128.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Zafirovski
Unification of Sociological Theory by the Rational Choice Model: Conceiving the Relationship between Economics and Sociology
Sociology,
August 1, 1999;
33(3):
495 - 514.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Perkmann
Social Integration and System Integration: Reconsidering the Classical Distinction
Sociology,
August 1, 1998;
32(3):
491 - 507.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Healy
Conceptualising Constraint: Mouzelis, Archer and the Concept of Social Structure
Sociology,
August 1, 1998;
32(3):
509 - 522.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Shilling
The Undersocialised Conception of the Embodied Agent in Modern Sociology
Sociology,
November 1, 1997;
31(4):
737 - 754.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|