Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by elbridge, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Manufacturing Control: Supervisory Systems on the `New' Shopfloor

Rick elbridge

James Lowe

Primary ethnographic research is drawn on in this paper so as to examine the nature of supervisory systems in two manufacturing organisations which have both, to varying degrees, implemented `new' manufacturing techniques such as just-in-time and total quality management and have organised around `teams'. Debates in industrial sociology and the labour process have understandably concentrated on the implications of such developments for workers; the important and problematic role of supervisors in realising managerial objectives has been largely neglected. This paper analyses the nature of supervision and the role of supervisors/first-line managers within contemporary manufacturing. In contrast to previous studies, which have sought to explain supervisory roles in terms of their link with structural factors such as technology, organisational size and formalisation (Perrow 1970; Woodward 1965), this paper highlights the importance of supervisors as social actors. The analysis demonstrates the dynamic and complex role of supervisors in implementing and adhering to managerial rules while needing to ensure a degree of operational flexibility that relies on informality, particularly in reaching accommodation with labour. These types of contradictory pressures have long been recognised in supervisory work (Roethlisberger 1945) but recent research into developments on the `new' shopfloor has failed adequately to report and conceptualise the increasingly complex position of supervisors and front-line managers.

Key Words: ethnography • just-in-time production • supervisors • total quality management

Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 3, 409-426 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038597031003003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
D. Fairris and H. Tohyama
Productive Efficiency and the Lean Production System in Japan and the United States
Economic and Industrial Democracy, November 1, 2002; 23(4): 529 - 554.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
G. Bonazzi
Between Shock Absorption and Continuous Improvement: Supervisors and Technicians in Fiat `Integrated Factory'
Work Employment Society, June 1, 1998; 12(2): 219 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]