Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blackburn, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Prandy, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Reproduction of Social Inequality

Robert M. Blackburn

Kenneth Prandy

Ideological assumptions of equality and economic individualism have permeated the traditional analysis of social mobility. This is shown most clearly in the use of perfect mobility as the theoretical model that underlies most of the empirical analyses. A major consequence is that these analyses have offered a poor conceptualisation of the nature of the structure within which movement occurs, and have tended to ignore the question of relative distances between the objects, typically conceived as social classes, making up that structure. A further consequence is that they have concentrated on the issue of how much mobility, rather than on why it does, or does not, occur. It is argued that a more adequate conceptualisation would involve a move away from rigidly defined class categories towards a recognition of the hierarchical structure of occupational groups.

Key Words: inequality • mobility • reproduction • social distance • social structure • stratification

Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 3, 491-509 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038597031003007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SociologyHome page
K. Prandy and W. Bottero
Social Reproduction and Mobility in Britain and Ireland in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries
Sociology, May 1, 2000; 34(2): 265 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
D. Reay
`Class Acts': Educational Involvement and Psycho-Sociological Class Processes
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 1999; 9(1): 89 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
R. M. Blackburn
A New System of Classes: But What are they and Do We Need Them?
Work Employment Society, December 1, 1998; 12(4): 735 - 741.
[PDF]