Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Studholme, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From Leonard Hobhouse to Tony Blair: A Sociological Connection?

Maggie Studholme

Aspects of the work of Britain's central contemporary sociological theorist, Anthony Giddens, are compared with that of L. T. Hobhouse, whose 1907 appointment as Martin White Professor at LSE marked the beginning of academic sociology in this country. The paper argues that in spite of much diversity during ninety years of academic sociology there is evidence for the existence of institutional, theoretical and political continuity in the mainstream. Institutional continuity results from the sluggish development of sociology during the first half of the century, when the only sociology degrees on offer were those validated by the LSE as part of the University of London. Theoretical continuity is evident in marked similarities between Giddens and Hobhouse, particularly in respect of their concepts of agency and reflexivity, as well as in their optimistic assessment of contemporary social trends. Hobhouse made a major contribution to the construction of New Liberal theory in the first quarter of the twentieth century. Giddens's political involvement with New Labour does not mark a substantial shift of alignment between sociology and party politics, but is essentially a continuation of the relationship fostered by Hobhouse between sociological theory and New Liberal politics.

Key Words: agency • Giddens • history • Hobhouse • politics • reflexivity • theory

Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 3, 531-547 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038597031003009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?