|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Undersocialised Conception of the Embodied Agent in Modern Sociology
Chris Shilling
Sociological reconceptualisations of the structure/agency divide have motivated important theoretical advances in the discipline, and the development of `structuration theories' and `analytical dualism' has promoted fresh thought about dominant views of the human agent. These approaches have sought to release sociology from any residual reliance on the oversocialised conception of the individual that formed part of the legacy of Parsonian sociology. It is the argument of this paper, however, that while structuration theory and analytical dualism focus on the creative powers of human reflexivity, as part of their rejection of the `oversocialised agent', the theoretical weight they place on consciousness neglects the socially shaped somatic bases of action and structure, and results in an undersocialised view of the embodied agent.
If the relationship between socialisation and agency needs analysing in terms of embodiment as much as in terms of the cognitive internalisation of norms and values, however, there are good reasons for structuration theory and analytical dualism rejecting attempts to ground subsequent notions of the embodied agent they may develop in dominant, static notions of the habitus. These minimise creativity and make it difficult to analyse social change. An important challenge for future reconceptualisations of the structure/agency divide, then, is to construct a sociology which recognises the significance for human agency of a socially shaped form of embodiment, yet which refuses to make the embodied actor a mere product of society.
Key Words: agency • analytical dualism • embodiment • socialisation • structuration theory
Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 4,
737-754 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038597031004006
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
S. Wray
Women Growing Older:: Agency, Ethnicity and Culture
Sociology,
August 1, 2003;
37(3):
511 - 527.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Budgeon
Identity as an Embodied Event
Body Society,
March 1, 2003;
9(1):
35 - 55.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Hancock and M. Tyler
Managing Subjectivity and the Dialectic of Self-Consciousness: Hegel and Organization Theory
Organization,
November 1, 2001;
8(4):
565 - 585.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. KATES and R. W. BELK
The Meanings of Lesbian and Gay Pride Day: Resistance through Consumption and Resistance to Consumption
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,
August 1, 2001;
30(4):
392 - 429.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Stones
Refusing the Realism--Structuration Divide
European Journal of Social Theory,
May 1, 2001;
4(2):
177 - 197.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linking the Social and Natural Sciences: Is Capital Modifying Human Biology in its Own Image?
Sociology,
February 1, 2001;
35(1):
93 - 110.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Ettorre
Reproductive Genetics, Gender and the Body: `Please Doctor, may I have a Normal Baby?'
Sociology,
August 1, 2000;
34(3):
403 - 420.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. WITZ
Whose Body Matters? Feminist Sociology and the Corporeal Turn in Sociology and Feminism
Body Society,
June 1, 2000;
6(2):
1 - 24.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Willmott
The Place of Culture in Organization Theory: Introducing the Morphogenetic Approach
Organization,
February 1, 2000;
7(1):
95 - 128.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Zafirovski
Unification of Sociological Theory by the Rational Choice Model: Conceiving the Relationship between Economics and Sociology
Sociology,
August 1, 1999;
33(3):
495 - 514.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Williams
Health as moral performance: ritual, transgression and taboo
Health (London) ,
October 1, 1998;
2(4):
435 - 457.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
