Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devine, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Class Analysis and the Stability of Class Relations

Fiona Devine

This paper examines Goldthorpe's attempt to develop a theory which explains the stability of class relations and the generative processes by which class inequalities are sustained in general and the application of rational action theory to the explanation of persistent class differentials in educational attainment in particular. It is argued that Goldthorpe has restricted the remit of his theory to the mobilisation of economic resources and that the importance of cultural and social resources in the reproduction of advantage has been dropped from view. This development derives from his minimalist definition of class in terms of employment relations rather than collectivities of people who share identities and practices. Furthermore, Goldthorpe's reliance on rational action theory has led to an overly materialistic view of how individuals and families mobilise their resources across generations. He ignores the role of norms and values in shaping action and the level of indeterminacy or precariousness by which advancement may or may not be achieved. The implications of these criticisms for the future of class analysis are explored.

Key Words: class analysis • middle class • rational action theory • resources • social mobility • strategies

Sociology, Vol. 32, No. 1, 23-42 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038598032001003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Work Employment SocietyHome page
A. Marks and C. Baldry
Stuck in the middle with who? The class identity of knowledge workers
Work Employment Society, March 1, 2009; 23(1): 49 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 European Journal of Social TheoryHome page
M. Savage
Contemporary Sociology and the Challenge of Descriptive Assemblage
European Journal of Social Theory, February 1, 2009; 12(1): 155 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SociologyHome page
W. Bottero
Class Identities and the Identity of Class
Sociology, December 1, 2004; 38(5): 985 - 1003.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
T. Butler
Living in the Bubble: Gentrification and its 'Others' in North London
Urban Stud, November 1, 2003; 40(12): 2469 - 2486.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Work Employment SocietyHome page
Y. Li, F. Bechhofer, R. Stewart, D. McCrone, M. Anderson, and L. Jamieson
A Divided Working Class? Planning and Career Perception in the Service and Working Classes
Work Employment Society, December 1, 2002; 16(4): 617 - 636.
[Abstract] [PDF]