Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bottero, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Sociology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 469-490 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038598032003004

Clinging to the Wreckage? Gender and the Legacy of Class

Wendy Bottero

The paper argues that the class legacy has had profoundly negative consequences for accounts of material gender inequality, and that even where gender theorists have attempted to move beyond class, they have been hampered by the fragments of class theory. It will be argued that whilst gender has posed a fundamental challenge to class analysis, the reconstructions which have been attempted have not escaped the central assumptions of class theory. The weakness of such reconstructions - hindered by flaws inherited from both the Marxian and neo-Weberian traditions of class analysis - has led some post-modern writers to question the very idea of a determinate, structural account of gender. At the time of writing, deconstruction - rather than reconstruction - is in the ascendent. However, whilst a structural account of gender can and should be defended, past attempts show that this cannot be achieved by clinging to the assumptions of class analysis, or by developing additive `class-plus-gender' explanations. Only those approaches which reject the economistic assumptions of class, by placing emphasis on the social space as a differentiated and determinate social whole, can overcome the limitations of current accounts of gender.

Key Words: class analysis • differentiation • gender • postmodernism • social space • theory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SociologyHome page
E. Bihagen
Does Class Matter Equally for Men and Women?: A Study of the Impact of Class on Wage Growth in Sweden 1999--2003
Sociology, June 1, 2008; 42(3): 522 - 540.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
K. Mirchandani
Challenging Racial Silences in Studies of Emotion Work: Contributions from Anti-Racist Feminist Theory
Organization Studies, June 1, 2003; 24(5): 721 - 742.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
F. Anthias
The Concept of `Social Division' and Theorising Social Stratification: Looking at Ethnicity and Class
Sociology, November 1, 2001; 35(4): 835 - 854.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
W. Bottero
Gender and the Labour Market at the Turn of the Century: Complexity, Ambiguity and Change
Work Employment Society, December 1, 2000; 14(4): 781 - 791.
[PDF]