This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bechhofer, F. Articles by Stewart, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Constructing National Identity: Arts and Landed Elites in Scotland

David McCrone

Richard Kiely

Robert Stewart

National identities are not essentially fixed or given but depend critically on the claims which people make in different contexts and at different times. The processes of identity rest not simply on the claims made but on how such claims are received, that is validated or rejected by significant others. Because actors are able, up to a point, to anticipate validation or rejection in particular contexts and at particular times, this influences the identity claims that they make. Identity is claimed and read off from various identity markers according to identity rules. Identity rules are the probabilistic rules of thumb whereby under certain structural conditions and in certain contexts, markers are interpreted, combined or given precedence one over another. This paper locates this approach to studies of national identity in the literature, and presents evidence for these assertions from a study of national identity, with examples taken from interviews in Scotland with two elite groups. Those interviewed were for a variety of reasons sensitive to issues of national identity. However, we argue that similar processes are at work generally, albeit people who have less reason to concern themselves with their own identity and the identity of those with whom they interact, see national identity more as something `taken-for-granted', and relatively fixed.

Key Words: identity claims • markers • national identity • rules • Scotland

Sociology, Vol. 33, No. 3, 515-534 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/S0038038599000334


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Netto Multiculturalism in the Devolved Context: Minority Ethnic Negotiation of Identity through Engagement in the Arts in Scotland Sociology, February 1, 2008; 42(1): 47 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Bond Belonging and Becoming: National Identity and Exclusion Sociology, August 1, 2006; 40(4): 609 - 626. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Gibson and J. Abell For Queen and Country? National Frames of Reference in the Talk of Soldiers in England Human Relations, July 1, 2004; 57(7): 871 - 891. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. McIntosh, D. Sim, and D. Robertson 'We Hate the English, Except for You, Cos You're Our Pal': Identification of the 'English' in Scotland Sociology, February 1, 2004; 38(1): 43 - 59. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. McCrone Who do you say you are?: Making sense of national identities in modern Britain Ethnicities, September 1, 2002; 2(3): 301 - 320. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Law Near and far: banal national identity and the press in Scotland Media Culture Society, May 1, 2001; 23(3): 299 - 317. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Comment on Frank Bechhofer, David McCrone, Richard Kiely and Robert Stewart, `Constructing National Identity: Arts and Landed Elites in Scotland' Sociology, February 1, 2001; 35(1): 195 - 199.