Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Division of Domestic Labour: Twenty Years of Change?

Oriel Sullivan

Department of Behavioral Sciences Ben Gurion University

This paper addresses two important questions in the area of the division of domestic labour. Firstly, what change is observable in the patterns of men and women's time spent in domestic labour over the past twenty years, when taking into account structural factors such as employment patterns and social class? Secondly, among which groups of the population of couples can change be identified? One of the problems of this area of research has been that relatively few studies have systematically analysed change over time using directly comparable large-scale data. Here I present a detailed examination of the nature and pattern of change in the domestic division of labour among couples in Britain based on nationally representative time-use diary data collected in 1975, 1987 and 1997. The data are drawn from a cross-national data archive held by the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Essex. Notwithstanding the fact that in 1997 women still performed the bulk of domestic work, it is found that, in relation to changes in time use in other areas of life, the increase in men's participation in domestic work (at least as measured in terms of time contributed) should be regarded as significant. In support of this, there had been (i) a reduction in gender inequality in the performance of some of the normatively feminine-associated tasks, (ii) a larger proportional increase in the time contributed to domestic work tasks by men from lower socio-economic strata, to a position of near equality with men from higher socio-economic positions, and (iii) a substantial increase in more `egalitarian' couples.

Key Words: change • class • domestic labour • gender • time-use

Sociology, Vol. 34, No. 3, 437-456 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/S0038038500000286


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SociologyHome page
B. Beagan, G. E. Chapman, A. D'Sylva, and B. R. Bassett
`It's Just Easier for Me to Do It': Rationalizing the Family Division of Foodwork
Sociology, August 1, 2008; 42(4): 653 - 671.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
Man Yee Kan
Does gender trump money? Housework hours of husbands and wives in Britain
Work Employment Society, March 1, 2008; 22(1): 45 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
L. McDowell, K. Ward, D. Perrons, K. Ray, and C. Fagan
Place, Class and Local Circuits of Reproduction: Exploring the Social Geography of Middle-class Childcare in London
Urban Stud, November 1, 2006; 43(12): 2163 - 2182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
C. J. Oates and S. McDonald
Recycling and the Domestic Division of Labour:: Is Green Pink or Blue?
Sociology, June 1, 2006; 40(3): 417 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
A. H.-n. Chan
The Effects of Full-Time Domestic Workers on Married Women's Economic Activity Status in Hong Kong, 1981-2001
International Sociology, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 133 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
R. Beaujot and J. Liu
Models of Time Use in Paid and Unpaid Work
Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2005; 26(7): 924 - 946.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
R. Crompton, M. Brockmann, and C. Lyonette
Attitudes, women's employment and the domestic division of labour: a cross-national analysis in two waves
Work Employment Society, June 1, 2005; 19(2): 213 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
L. McDowell
Love, money, and gender divisions of labour: some critical reflections on welfare-to-work policies in the UK
J. Econ. Geogr., June 1, 2005; 5(3): 365 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
L. McKie, S. Bowlby, and S. Gregory
Starting Well: Gender, Care and Health in the Family Context
Sociology, July 1, 2004; 38(3): 593 - 611.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
O. Sullivan
Changing Gender Practices within the Household: A Theoretical Perspective
Gender Society, April 1, 2004; 18(2): 207 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
N. Watson, L. McKie, B. Hughes, D. Hopkins, and S. Gregory
(Inter)Dependence, Needs and Care: The Potential for Disability and Feminist Theorists to Develop an Emancipatory Model
Sociology, April 1, 2004; 38(2): 331 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
J. Dixon and M. Wetherell
On Discourse and Dirty Nappies: Gender, the Division of Household Labour and the Social Psychology of Distributive Justice
Theory Psychology, April 1, 2004; 14(2): 167 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Consumer CultureHome page
O. Sullivan and J. Gershuny
Inconspicuous Consumption: Work-Rich, Time-Poor in the Liberal Market Economy
Journal of Consumer Culture, March 1, 2004; 4(1): 79 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
K. Natalier
`I'm not his Wife': Doing Gender and doing Housework in the Absence of Women
Journal of Sociology, September 1, 2003; 39(3): 253 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
S. Duncan, R. Edwards, T. Reynolds, and P. alldred
Motherhood, Paid Work and Partnering: Values and Theories
Work Employment Society, June 1, 2003; 17(2): 309 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
J. Baxter
Patterns of change and stability in the gender division of household labour in Australia, 1986-1997
Journal of Sociology, December 1, 2002; 38(4): 399 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
L. McKie, S. Gregory, and S. Bowlby
Shadow Times: The Temporal and Spatial Frameworks and Experiences of Caring and Working
Sociology, November 1, 2002; 36(4): 897 - 924.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
K. Dempsey
Who gets the best deal from marriage: women or men?
Journal of Sociology, June 1, 2002; 38(2): 91 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
S. Punch
Household Division of Labour: Generation, Gender, Age, Birth Order and Sibling Composition
Work Employment Society, December 1, 2001; 15(4): 803 - 823.
[Abstract] [PDF]