Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Möllering, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Nature of Trust: From Georg Simmel to a Theory of Expectation, Interpretation and Suspension

Guido Möllering

Institute for Business Administration Free University of Berlin

This article undertakes a substantial theoretical reorientation of research into the concept of trust. Analysing key passages in the work of Georg Simmel, it is argued that the link between trust bases and a trustful state of expectation is much weaker than is commonly assumed. In particular, Simmel recognises a `further element', a kind of faith, that is required to explain trust and its unique nature. His work has influenced key authors in the field such as Luhmann and Giddens, but the `further element' that concerns the crucial, proverbial leap of trust is still underdeveloped. Hence, the article proceeds to conceptualise trust as a mental process of three elements that further research should embrace: expectation, interpretation and suspension. Expectation is the state (outcome) at the end of the process. It is preceded by the combination of interpretation and suspension. The former concerns the experiencing of reality that provides `good reasons'. It is recognised that current trust research already moves away from the rational choice model and allows for affective and abstract (moral) trust bases. However, any form of interpretation is limited and does not inevitably enable expectation. Therefore, an additional element (in line with Simmel) is introduced in this article: suspension. This is the mechanism of bracketing the unknowable, thus making interpretative knowledge momentarily certain. Suspension enables the leap of trust. Functional consequences of trust such as risk-taking, co-operation, relationships or social capital should not be confounded with trust.

Key Words: Georg Simmel • interpretation • social theory • suspension • trust

Sociology, Vol. 35, No. 2, 403-420 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/S0038038501000190


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
A. R. Timming
Trust in Cross-national Labour Relations: A Case Study of an Anglo-Dutch European Works Council
Eur. Sociol. Rev., August 1, 2009; 25(4): 505 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
M. Alvesson and D. Karreman
Unraveling HRM: Identity, Ceremony, and Control in a Management Consulting Firm
Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 711 - 723.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
M. Tillmar and L. Lindkvist
Cooperation Against All Odds: Finding Reasons for Trust where Formal Institutions Fail
International Sociology, June 1, 2007; 22(3): 343 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
D. Khodyakov
Trust as a Process: A Three-Dimensional Approach
Sociology, February 1, 2007; 41(1): 115 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
P. Ward and A. Coates
'We shed tears, but there is no one there to wipe them up for us': narratives of (mis)trust in a materially deprived community.
Health (London) , July 1, 2006; 10(3): 283 - 301.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
G. Mollering
The Trust/Control Duality: An Integrative Perspective on Positive Expectations of Others
International Sociology, September 1, 2005; 20(3): 283 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
P. Lowe
Embodied expertise: women's perceptions of the contraception consultation
Health (London) , July 1, 2005; 9(3): 361 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
S. V. Scott and G. Walsham
Reconceptualizing and Managing Reputation Risk in the Knowledge Economy: Toward Reputable Action
Organization Science, May 1, 2005; 16(3): 308 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
J. Brownlie and A. Howson
'Leaps of Faith' and MMR: An Empirical Study of Trust
Sociology, April 1, 2005; 39(2): 221 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
S. Henderson and M. Gilding
'I've Never Clicked this Much with Anyone in My Life': Trust and Hyperpersonal Communication in Online Friendships
New Media Society, August 1, 2004; 6(4): 487 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Social TheoryHome page
J. Jalava
From Norms to Trust: The Luhmannian Connections between Trust and System
European Journal of Social Theory, May 1, 2003; 6(2): 173 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
J. Child and G. Mollering
Contextual Confidence and Active Trust Development in the Chinese Business Environment
Organization Science, January 1, 2003; 14(1): 69 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]