This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Southerton, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Boundaries of `Us' and `Them': Class, Mobility and Identification in a New Town

University of Manchester Dale.Southerton{at}man.ac.uk

Whether social class shapes identification (senses of belonging to specified social groups) is subject to much debate. This article examines the boundaries of identification described by three groups living in a Southern English new town. The three groups systematically differed in their volumes of economic, cultural and social resources, and patterns of geographical mobility. Members identified themselves as belonging within each group through interpretations of shared social practices and orientations toward everyday life. Boundaries drawn between `Us' and `Them' by all three groups were based on generic social categorizations of class and expressed through socio-economic, cultural and moral frameworks of status evaluation. However, identifications were asymmetrical because two groups, the closest in terms of resource volumes, differentiated from one another despite employing the same frameworks for evaluating status. Internal differences were also apparent in the third group; those who had lived in the area longest offered greater degrees of specificity and certainty when identifying `Us'. It is argued that the relationship between class and identification is not straightforward. In this case, the organization of the town's social relations, with its normative conventions and local reputations, coupled with respondents' different patterns of geographical mobility acted to configure interpretations of who constituted `Us' and `Them'.

Key Words: belonging • boundaries • class • identification • lifestyle • social worlds

Sociology, Vol. 36, No. 1, 171-193 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038502036001009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Allen, R. Powell, R. Casey, and S. Coward `Ordinary, the Same as Anywhere Else': Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity in `Marginal' Middle-Class Neighbourhoods Sociology, April 1, 2007; 41(2): 239 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Hayward and M. Yar The 'chav' phenomenon: Consumption, media and the construction of a new underclass Crime Media Culture, April 1, 2006; 2(1): 9 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Sayer Class, Moral Worth and Recognition Sociology, December 1, 2005; 39(5): 947 - 963. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Bottero Class Identities and the Identity of Class Sociology, December 1, 2004; 38(5): 985 - 1003. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Martens, D. Southerton, and S. Scott Bringing Children (and Parents) into the Sociology of Consumption: Towards a Theoretical and Empirical Agenda Journal of Consumer Culture, July 1, 2004; 4(2): 155 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF]