Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Imagined Communities and Self-identity: An Exploratory Quantitative Analysis

Tim Phillips

School of Sociology and Social Work, University of Tasmania Timothy.Phillips{at}utas.edu.au

The proliferation of quantitative studies of national and other macro-level we-images points to a growing sociological interest in the contribution of imagined communities to self-identity. However, these studies have tended to present an oversimplified picture of this cultural phenomenon, relying on essentialist, one-dimensional and non-divisible conceptions of the social self. It is the contention of this paper that important clues for clarifying the less developed approaches to self-identity that feature in such quantitative work can be found in Benedict Anderson's landmark analysis of imagined communities. Anderson's treatment of this topic is used to sensitize a survey analysis of self-identification with large-scale geographic units among contemporary Australians. Findings from the investigation highlight a neglect in emerging quantitative research on self-attachment to imagined communities of (i) the plural sources, multi-dimensional nature and divisible character of self-identity, and (ii) the complex ways in which different layers of self-identity interlock to shape social attitudes.

Key Words: Benedict Anderson • geographic units • imagined communities • self-identity • social distance • survey research

Sociology, Vol. 36, No. 3, 597-617 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038502036003006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
L. Calcutt, I. Woodward, and Z. Skrbis
Conceptualizing otherness: An exploration of the cosmopolitan schema
Journal of Sociology, June 1, 2009; 45(2): 169 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
V. Roudometof
Transnationalism, Cosmopolitanism and Glocalization
Current Sociology, January 1, 2005; 53(1): 113 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
A. Newman and F. McLean
Capital and the evaluation of the museum experience
International Journal of Cultural Studies, December 1, 2004; 7(4): 480 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]