Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Partners in Power: Governing the Self-sustaining Community

Barry Schofield

Centre for Social Theory and Technology, Keele University and Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council, North Staffordshire barry.schofield{at}newcastle-staffs.gov.uk

The language of community is widely diffused in both social theory and in public policy. Under New Labour it finds expression in obligations on health authorities and local councils to consult and collaborate with their communities in formulating and providing services. Yet such initiatives often treat community as an already existing entity, a proper noun that refers to a solid and stable reality. This article analyses the contemporary appeal of community and outlines some of the problems of trying to think of `it' in the abstract, as a reified essence. Instead, the article offers a different way of thinking about community, as an assemblage of artefacts - political rationales, expert discourses, administrative technologies and bodies - that constitute `its' manifold components in precise historical contexts. Drawing on Foucault's insights into governmentality, the article traces the discursive ways in which managers utilize these empirical resources in the specific setting of an urban regeneration scheme.

Key Words: community • empowerment • partnership • regeneration • representation • technology

Sociology, Vol. 36, No. 3, 663-683 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038502036003009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
G. Hughes and M. Rowe
Neighbourhood policing and community safety: Researching the instabilities of the local governance of crime, disorder and security in contemporary UK
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, November 1, 2007; 7(4): 317 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Development StudiesHome page
S. Morse and N. McNamara
Analysing institutional partnerships in development: a contract between equals or a loaded process?
Progress in Development Studies, October 1, 2006; 6(4): 321 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]