Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marinetto, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Sociology, Vol. 37, No. 1, 103-120 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038503037001390

Who Wants to be an Active Citizen?

The Politics and Practice of Community Involvement

Michael Marinetto

Cardiff University marinettom{at}cardiff.ac.uk

The notions of active citizenship and community involvement have become increasingly prominent in political discussions and policy practices within Britain in the past 15 years. This is a significant development as the modus operandi of modern liberal democracies has been a representative mode of government in which the wider citizenry has a passive role. This paper contextualizes active citizenship in terms of the interrelationship between civic society and the political realm. The Foucauldian-inspired literature on governmentality has made a concerted attempt to examine such issues. Governmentality regards government, not in the conventional sense as the provenance of centralized institutions, where interest groups and ideologies play their part, but as a complex and ever-changing process that forges ways of thinking about governing with a myriad of practices that proliferate throughout society. Whilst it is informative, it is questioned whether this analytic approach can fully explain and illuminate political developments like active citizenship, given its rejection of realist and critical approaches to government. The second half of the paper addresses such concerns. Here, community involvement is regarded as a contested notion and one where the central state has played a prominent role. To highlight these analytical points, the historical development and political configuration of community involvement over the past 20 years is traced. It is shown that central government, through policies influenced by contrasting ideological conceptions of citizenship and political expediency, has played a key role in shaping community involvement.

Key Words: Active citizenship • classical democracy • community involvement • decentred versus top-down perspectives • governmentality • policy-making • protective democracy • rationalities of rule


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Mathers, J. Parry, and S. Jones
Exploring Resident (Non-)participation in the UK New Deal for Communities Regeneration Programme
Urban Stud, March 1, 2008; 45(3): 591 - 606.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
R. Tutton
Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases: Citizenship, Governance, and Ambivalence
Science Technology Human Values, March 1, 2007; 32(2): 172 - 195.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
A. Lacey and S. Ilcan
Voluntary Labor, Responsible Citizenship, and International NGOs
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, February 1, 2006; 47(1): 34 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
R. Meade
We hate it here, please let us stay! Irish social partnership and the community/voluntary sector's conflicted experiences of recognition
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2005; 25(3): 349 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
A. Dinham
Empowered or over-powered? The real experiences of local participation in the UK's New Deal for Communities
Community Dev. J., July 1, 2005; 40(3): 301 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]