Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prandy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Marriage, Social Distance and the Social Space:

An Alternative Derivation and Validation of the Cambridge Scale

Kenneth Prandy

Cardiff University, prandyk{at}cf.ac.uk

Paul Lambert

University of Stirling, LambertP{at}cf.ac.uk

There is a danger that the Cambridge Scale, which is based on data collected thirty years ago, is becoming out of date. This article considers an alternative basis for a social interaction-based social distance scale, that of marriage (or cohabitation) rather than friendship. This has considerable advantages in terms of the ready, low-cost availability of large-scale, representative data (usually from a census). It also makes easily possible the construction of comparable scales for many other countries. The article discusses the theoretical background to the approach and the justification for expecting that marriage and friendship would reflect equivalent structures of stratification arrangements. In order to provide direct comparability, a new scale was constructed, based on 1971 census data and using more satisfactory statistical techniques. Empirical analyses using this measure fully support the argument that this alternative method of deriving a scale leads to essentially the same results as the original. The way is therefore open for an updating of the scale and its extension to a number of other countries, under the generic heading of CAMSIS.

Key Words: Cambridge Scale • CAMSIS • social distance • social interaction • stratification

Sociology, Vol. 37, No. 3, 397-411 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/00380385030373001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
J Torssander and R Erikson
Marital partner and mortality: the effects of the social positions of both spouses
J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2009; 63(12): 992 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
J. H. Goldthorpe
Analysing Social Inequality: A Critique of Two Recent Contributions from Economics and Epidemiology
Eur. Sociol. Rev., October 22, 2009; (2009) jcp046v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
J. Torssander and R. Erikson
Stratification and Mortality--A Comparison of Education, Class, Status, and Income
Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2009; (2009) jcp034v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
E. Bihagen
Class Origin Effects on Downward Career Mobility in Sweden 1982 2001
Acta Sociologica, December 1, 2007; 50(4): 415 - 430.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
F. Popham, J. J. Walker, and R. Mitchell
Could using general health and longstanding limiting illness as a joint health outcome add to understanding in social inequalities research?
J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2007; 29(2): 208 - 210.
[Full Text] [PDF]