| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Reading Bourdieu with AdornoThe Limits of Critical Theory and Reflexive SociologyDalhousie University Scholarly activity presupposes a certain distance from the concerns of everyday life, which has both liberating and crippling effects. Bourdieus reflexive sociology hopes to undo these crippling effects by making the scholar aware of the limits of his/her liberation. Through his emphasis on the practical content of social life, Bourdieu provides a powerful alternative to theoretical critiques of contemporary society advanced by sociologists such as Adorno. At the same time, read against the background of Adornos critical theory, this reflexive move itself appears as a limitation. Due to its emphasis on the conditions of sociological knowledge, reflexive sociology tends to subordinate theory to epistemology and, therefore, hinders the sociologist from imagining a different society. Read together, Bourdieus and Adornos works provide important insights about two potential dangers that remain on the path of the sociologist. Adornos critique of scientism implies that adhering to an epistemological principle may not be enough to escape the fallacious representations of social reality, while Bourdieus critique of theoreticism implies that one cannot grasp social reality without touching it.
Key Words: Adorno Bourdieu critical theory epistemology methodology reflexivity
Sociology, Vol. 38, No. 2,
351-368 (2004) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


