This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Macnaghten, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Animals in their Nature

A Case Study on Public Attitudes to Animals, Genetic Modification and ‘Nature’

Lancaster University, p.macnaghten{at}lancaster.ac.uk

This article seeks to engage with contemporary debates on the social and ethical dimensions of genetically modified (GM) animals. Dominant policy ethical approaches and frameworks are criticized for failing radically to accommodate some of the most important dimensions of concern. Drawing on primary empirical data emphasizing existing embodied relationships to animals, the article analyses how people express ethical concern over GM animals, including their sense of the continuities and discontinuities between GM animals and those determined by conventional selective breeding practices. The findings suggest that GM animals are likely to become an issue of public controversy, especially in the animal testing domain, due to the ways in which they symbolize and give voice to underlying tensions between ‘moral’and ‘instrumental’approaches to animals.The article concludes that people reject GM animals as ‘going against nature’, and that such concerns reflect wider unease about science, about technological modernity, and about hubris.

Key Words: animals • embodiment • ethics • genetic modification • nature • risk

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Macnaghten, M. B. Kearnes, and B. Wynne Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences? Science Communication, December 1, 2005; 27(2): 268 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]