Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webb, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Organizations, Self-Identities and the New Economy

Janette Webb

University of Edinburgh, jan.webb{at}ed.ac.uk

The article examines the inter-relations between self-identity and organizational change in advanced capitalist societies characterized by deregulation of markets, privatization and globalizing economic relations. It compares two contrasting perspectives on selfhood: the reflexive self (Giddens, 1991) and the corroded self (Sennett, 1998). Giddens suggests that contemporary organizations, rather than eroding meaning, offer a greater degree of choice about self-identity, and enhance reflexivity and agency. Sennett suggests that new economic forms are corrosive of character and social relations. Using examples from predominantly British data, it is argued that both accounts offer relevant insights into the interplay between selfhood and organizations, but that each overstates their case. Giddens offers a persuasive account of the choice and voluntarism characterizing self-identity for at least a proportion of the population. His account of the ‘project of the self’, however, contributes to an ideology of the flexible, commodified self, and an overly inflated sense of the potential for individualized self-growth. Sennett over-emphasizes the extent of change in organization and employment relations, at least in the British case, but points to the damaging effects of an ideology of individualism, to which Giddens’ model of the self as project potentially contributes. The article argues that short-termism is not the most damaging element of contemporary organization practices. Instead increased instrumentalism on the part of employers results in the experience of increased responsibility without meaningful discretion and authority. The gap between employers’ promises to empower people at work and the experience of greater burdens and uncertain prospects has negative consequences for trust and morale. In conclusion, it is suggested that character is not necessarily undermined by such dynamics: encountering the limits of self-determination, reflexivity and individualism provides the material for critique of new economic forms, as evidenced by public concern with issues of care and mutual dependence.

Key Words: employment • new economy • organizations • self-identity • work

Sociology, Vol. 38, No. 4, 719-738 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038504045861


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
A. Sturdy, T. Clark, R. Fincham, and K. Handley
Between Innovation and Legitimation-- Boundaries and Knowledge Flow in Management Consultancy
Organization, September 1, 2009; 16(5): 627 - 653.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
S. Sengupta, P. K. Edwards, and C.-J. Tsai
The Good, the Bad, and the Ordinary: Work Identities in "Good" and "Bad" Jobs in the United Kingdom
Work and Occupations, February 1, 2009; 36(1): 26 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
A. Brooks and L. Wee
Reflexivity and the Transformation of Gender Identity: Reviewing the Potential for Change in a Cosmopolitan City
Sociology, June 1, 2008; 42(3): 503 - 521.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
A. Sturdy and C. Wright
A Consulting Diaspora? Enterprising Selves as Agents of Enterprise
Organization, May 1, 2008; 15(3): 427 - 444.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
C.-J. Tsai, S. Sengupta, and P. Edwards
When and why is small beautiful? The experience of work in the small firm
Human Relations, December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1779 - 1807.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EthnographyHome page
J. Hassard, L. McCann, and J. Morris
At the sharp end of new organizational ideologies Ethnography and the study of multinationals
Ethnography, September 1, 2007; 8(3): 324 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
A. Sturdy, M. Brocklehurst, D. Winstanley, and M. Littlejohns
Management as a (Self) Confidence Trick: Management Ideas, Education and Identity Work
Organization, November 1, 2006; 13(6): 841 - 860.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
A. Sturdy, M. Schwarz, and A. Spicer
Guess who's coming to dinner? Structures and uses of liminality in strategic management consultancy
Human Relations, July 1, 2006; 59(7): 929 - 960.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
M. Banks
Moral Economy and Cultural Work
Sociology, June 1, 2006; 40(3): 455 - 472.
[Abstract] [PDF]