Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, J.
Right arrow Articles by Harding, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

We Went Looking for an Organization but Could Find Only the Metaphysics of its Presence

Jackie Ford

University of Leeds, j.m.ford{at}leeds.ac.uk

Nancy Harding

University of Leeds, hssnhh{at}leeds.ac.uk

This article explores the ‘lifeworld theories’ of organizations held by organizational actors, gathered from staff and managers of two ‘organizations’ as they went through a process of merger. Using Henri Lefebvre’s theories of place and space read through a postmodernist lens to interrogate the data, we discovered amongst staff theories of the organization as place, arising out of the material territory in which they worked. Amongst managers and those whom we call directors/chief executives there was a contrasting theory of organization as space, based upon a sense of an immaterial space occupied by a metaphysical organization. Rather than finding a dualistic distinction between organization and agents, we found the organization and organizational members collapsed in upon each other, with managerial identities fused with and inseparable from that of ‘the organization’; chief executives requiring the existence of an impossible organization that could exist only in their minds; and non-managerial employees refusing to identify anything called ‘an organization’.

Key Words: modern organizations • organizational dualism • postmodern organizations • space and place

Sociology, Vol. 38, No. 4, 815-830 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038504045866


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
Zhongyuan Zhang, A. Spicer, and P. Hancock
Hyper-Organizational Space in the Work of J. G. Ballard
Organization, November 1, 2008; 15(6): 889 - 910.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
F. Cooren, B. H.J.M. Brummans, and D. Charrieras
The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Medecins Sans Frontieres in action
Human Relations, October 1, 2008; 61(10): 1339 - 1370.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
J. Ford and N. Harding
Fear and Loathing in Harrogate, or a Study of a Conference
Organization, March 1, 2008; 15(2): 233 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
N. Harding
On Lacan and the `Becoming-ness' of Organizations/Selves
Organization Studies, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 1761 - 1773.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
A. Spicer
Beyond the Convergence-Divergence Debate: The Role of Spatial Scales in Transforming Organizational Logic
Organization Studies, October 1, 2006; 27(10): 1467 - 1483.
[Abstract] [PDF]