Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Crockett, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Sociology, Vol. 39, No. 1, 11-28 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038505048998

Religion in Britain: Neither Believing nor Belonging

David Voas

University of Manchester, voas{at}man.ac.uk

Alasdair Crockett

University of Essex, crockett{at}essex.ac.uk

‘Believing without belonging’ has become the catchphrase of much European work on religion in the past decade. The thesis that religious belief is fairly robust even if churchgoing is declining is examined using data from the British Household Panel Survey and the British Social Attitudes surveys. The evidence suggests that belief has in fact eroded in Britain at the same rate as two key aspects of belonging: religious affiliation and attendance. Levels of belief are lower than those of nominal belonging. The roles of period, cohort and age effects on religious change are considered; the conclusion is that decline is generational. In relation to the rates at which religion is transmitted from parents to children, the results suggest that only about half of parental religiosity is successfully transmitted, while absence of religion is almost always passed on. Transmission is just as weak for believing as for belonging.

Key Words: belief • cohort effect • intergenerational transmission • religion • secularization


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Journal of Women's StudiesHome page
A. Day
Wilfully Disempowered: A Gendered Response to a `Fallen World'
European Journal of Women's Studies, August 1, 2008; 15(3): 261 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
D. Voas
The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe
Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 19, 2008; (2008) jcn044v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social CompassHome page
C. Wolf
How Secularized is Germany? Cohort and Comparative Perspectives
Social Compass, June 1, 2008; 55(2): 111 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social CompassHome page
J. Stolz
Debats autour de la secularisation, la "guerre des genres'' et le clivage entre qualitatif et quantitatif
Social Compass, June 1, 2008; 55(2): 194 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
D. Denney, J. Gabe, and M. O'Beirne
Anglican Clergy as Victims of Routinized Violent Activities in Urban and Rural Localities
Sociology, February 1, 2008; 42(1): 83 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]