This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (19) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Voas, D. Articles by Crockett, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Religion in Britain: Neither Believing nor Belonging

University of Manchester, voas{at}man.ac.uk

Alasdair Crockett

University of Essex, crockett{at}essex.ac.uk

‘Believing without belonging’ has become the catchphrase of much European work on religion in the past decade. The thesis that religious belief is fairly robust even if churchgoing is declining is examined using data from the British Household Panel Survey and the British Social Attitudes surveys. The evidence suggests that belief has in fact eroded in Britain at the same rate as two key aspects of belonging: religious affiliation and attendance. Levels of belief are lower than those of nominal belonging. The roles of period, cohort and age effects on religious change are considered; the conclusion is that decline is generational. In relation to the rates at which religion is transmitted from parents to children, the results suggest that only about half of parental religiosity is successfully transmitted, while absence of religion is almost always passed on. Transmission is just as weak for believing as for belonging.

Key Words: belief • cohort effect • intergenerational transmission • religion • secularization

Sociology, Vol. 39, No. 1, 11-28 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038505048998


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. M. Guerra and R. Giner-Sorolla The Community, Autonomy, and Divinity Scale (CADS): A New Tool for the Cross-Cultural Study of Morality Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2010; 41(1): 35 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Horwath and J. Lees Assessing the Influence of Religious Beliefs and Practices on Parenting Capacity: The Challenges for Social Work Practitioners Br. J. Soc. Work, January 1, 2010; 40(1): 82 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Voas The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe Eur. Sociol. Rev., April 1, 2009; 25(2): 155 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Day Wilfully Disempowered: A Gendered Response to a `Fallen World' European Journal of Women's Studies, August 1, 2008; 15(3): 261 - 276. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Wolf How Secularized is Germany? Cohort and Comparative Perspectives Social Compass, June 1, 2008; 55(2): 111 - 126. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Stolz Debats autour de la secularisation, la "guerre des genres'' et le clivage entre qualitatif et quantitatif Social Compass, June 1, 2008; 55(2): 194 - 202. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Denney, J. Gabe, and M. O'Beirne Anglican Clergy as Victims of Routinized Violent Activities in Urban and Rural Localities Sociology, February 1, 2008; 42(1): 83 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. Grim and R. Finke Religious Persecution in Cross-National Context: Clashing Civilizations or Regulated Religious Economies? American Sociological Review, August 1, 2007; 72(4): 633 - 658. [Abstract] [PDF]