Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by May, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Clinical Encounter and the Problem of Context

Carl May

University of Newcastle

The encounter between professional and patient is one of the basic units of analysis in the field of ‘medical’ sociology. From the very beginnings of the sociological investigation of medical practice it has been conceived as a dyadic encounter, defined by asymmetries of power, the negotiation of rational and authoritative scientific knowledge, and private, proximal, relations. This article argues for a more dynamic theoretical vision of the clinical encounter: one that shifts attention away from a Parsonian ‘paradigm’ of professional–patient interaction towards a perspective that incorporates the systemic changes that late modernity brings to medicine.The clinical encounter is no longer the dyadic system envisaged by Parsons, and his theoretical perspective–which has played an important part in framing sociological accounts of the practice of medicine – now needs to be reframed in relation to the organizing impulses of contemporary corporate professional practice.

Key Words: doctor–patient interaction • medical knowledge • medical practice • physician–patient relationship • Talcott Parsons

Sociology, Vol. 41, No. 1, 29-45 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038507072282


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
R. McDonald, J. White, and T. R. Marmor
Paying for Performance in Primary Medical Care: Learning about and Learning from "Success" and "Failure" in England and California
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2009; 34(5): 747 - 776.
[Abstract] [PDF]