This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McLaughlin, N. Articles by Turcotte, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Trouble with Burawoy: An Analytic, Synthetic Alternative

McMaster University, nmclaugh{at}mcmaster.ca

Kerry Turcotte

McMaster University

As American Sociological Association (ASA) president in 2004, Michael Burawoy argued `for public sociology', sparking impassioned debate focused almost exclusively on the normative issues raised by his prescription for a more public sociology. Nearly absent from the literature is an analytical critique of his underlying model of the structure of sociological practice. The model is flawed in three ways: (1) the core concepts are ambiguous; (2) the model provides little leverage for understanding the institutional context of sociology as a discipline; and (3) comparative understanding of sociologies in different countries or between public engagement in distinct academic disciplines is not facilitated. In this article, we propose a synthetic means of relating academics, disciplines, audiences and institutional environments that forms the basis for movement toward an empirical agenda on public academics more generally.

Key Words: academic disciplines • Burawoy • comparative sociology • public intellectuals • public sociology • sociology of knowledge

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?