| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
`Knowledge Once Divided Can Be Hard to Put Together Again'An Epistemological Critique of Collaborative and Team-Based Research PracticesUniversity of Aberdeen, n.mauthner{at}abdn.ac.uk
Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, andreadoucet{at}sympatico.ca This article critically examines team and collaborative research as an `academic mode of production'. Our main argument is that while theoretically qualitative social science research is rooted within a postfoundational epistemological paradigm, normative team-based research practices embody foundational principles. Team research relies on a division of labour that creates divisions and hierarchies of knowledge, particularly between researchers who gather embodied and contextual knowledge `in the field' and those who produce textual knowledge `in the office'. We argue that a theoretical commitment to a postfoundational epistemology demands that we translate this into concrete research practices that rely on concerted team-based relations rather than divisions of labour, and a reflexive research practice that strives to involve all team members in all aspects of knowledge construction processes.
Key Words: collaboration contextual knowledge divisions of knowledge divisions of labour embodied knowledge epistemology reflexivity research teams textual knowledge
Sociology, Vol. 42, No. 5,
971-985 (2008) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
