Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Some Intra-Regional Variations in Educational Provision and their Bearing Upon Educational Attainment—The Case of the North East

D. S. Byrne

Department of Sociology and Social Administration at the University of Durham

W. Williamson

Department of Sociology and Social Administration at the University of Durham

This paper is concerned with the influence of the policy of local education authorities upon educational attainment. We suggest that the influence of local policy has been neglected in the sociology of education and hypothesize that policy variables are likely to be of major importance as determinants of attainment. Evidence drawn from correlations of policy, provision and social-class variables with each other and with various measures of attainment tends to validate this suggestion, and indicates that two `policy-models' of local authority activity may be appropriate: viz, the elite-orientated authority model, in which resources are differentially concentrated on a sponsored elite with consequent high attainment of this elite; and the egalitarian authority model where resources are more evenly spread throughout the school system with consequent `inferior' attainment of an elitist kind, but where the evidence suggests there is higher overall attainment of the total school system product. It would also appear that the determinant of the policy set pursued by an L.E.A. is the social class background of the area it covers.

Sociology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 71-87 (1972)
DOI: 10.1177/003803857200600105


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban EducationHome page
P. Clark
Compensatory Education: The Underlying Stances and Teachers' Attitudes
Urban Education, January 1, 1975; 9(4): 340 - 354.



Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
J. W.B. Douglas and M. Lowe
Longitudinal surveys and the study of social mobility
Social Science Information, August 1, 1973; 12(4): 67 - 88.



Home page
Urban EducationHome page
D. S. Byrne, W. Williamson, and B. G. Fletcher
Models of Educational Attainment: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique
Urban Education, April 1, 1973; 8(1): 41 - 74.