This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (72) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mulkay, M. J. Articles by Woolgar, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Problem Areas and Research Networks in Science

University of York

G. N. Gilbert

University of York

S. Woolgar

University of York

A general account is presented of the emergence, growth, and decline of scientific research networks and their associated problem areas. Research networks are seen to pass through three phases. The first, exploratory phase is distinguished by a lack of effective communication among participants and by the pursuit of imprecisely defined problems. The second phase is one of rapid growth, associated with increasing social and intellectual integration, made possible by improved communication. An increasingly precise scientific consensus gradually emerges from a process of negotiation, in which those participants who are members of the scientific elite exert most influence. But as consensus is achieved the problem area becomes less scientifically fruitful; and as the network grows, career opportunities diminish. Consequently, the third, final phase is one of decline and disbandment of the network, together with the movement of participants to new areas of scientific opportunity.

Sociology, Vol. 9, No. 2, 187-203 (1975)
DOI: 10.1177/003803857500900201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. PERRY and R. E. RICE Network Influences on Involvement in the Hybrid Problem Area of Developmental Dyslexia Science Communication, September 1, 1999; 21(1): 38 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Jacobs and B. Mooney Sociology as a Source of Anomaly in Thomas Kuhn's System of Science Philosophy of the Social Sciences, December 1, 1997; 27(4): 466 - 485. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. Friedmanl The Information Technology Field: Using Fields and Paradigms for Analyzing Technological Change Human Relations, April 1, 1994; 47(4): 367 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. HALPERN and R. R. ANSPACH The Study of Medical Institutions: Eliot Freidson's Legacy Work and Occupations, August 1, 1993; 20(3): 279 - 295. [Abstract]

				R. D. Whitley From the sociology of scientific communities to the study of scientists' negotiations and beyond Social Science Information, July 1, 1983; 22(4-5): 681 - 720.

				M. Callon, J.-P. Courtial, W. A. Turner, and S. Bauin From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis Social Science Information, March 1, 1983; 22(2): 191 - 235.

				L. Harvey The Use and Abuse of Kuhnian Paradigms in the Sociology of Knowledge Sociology, February 1, 1982; 16(1): 85 - 101. [PDF]

				G. N. Gilbert Being interviewed: A role analysis Social Science Information, May 1, 1980; 19(2): 227 - 236.

				R. Whitley Types of science, organizational strategies and patterns of work in research laboratories in different scientific fields Social Science Information, June 1, 1978; 17(3): 427 - 447.

				M. Mulkay Consensus in science Social Science Information, February 1, 1978; 17(1): 107 - 122.

				M. Mulkay The Mediating Role of the Scientific Elite Social Studies of Science, September 1, 1976; 6(3-4): 445 - 470. [PDF]

				R. Johnston Contextual Knowledge: A Model for the Overthrow of the Internal/External Dichotomy in Science1 Journal of Sociology, January 1, 1976; 12(3): 193 - 203. [PDF]