Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, S.
Right arrow Articles by McMullan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Ethics in the UK: What Can Sociology Learn from Health?

Sue Richardson

University of Plymouth, smrichardson{at}plymouth.ac.uk

Miriam McMullan

University of Plymouth, mmcmullan{at}plymouth.ac.uk

The article reviews ethical consideration in social research and identifies current approaches to safeguarding ethical standards. One of these is the requirement to obtain approval from research ethics committees (RECs). Based on the results of a survey of UK social science academics about the process of applying to National Health Service RECs, we conclude that lessons can be learned for Sociology from the experiences of social researchers in Health. Overly rigid ethics committees could be counter-productive; we may need to reassess the functions of RECs and to strengthen other procedures to ensure the highest ethical standards for Sociology. Some suggestions for how this might be done are taken from the literature in the hope that they will stimulate debate.

Key Words: health • research ethics • research governance • social research • web-based survey

References

  • Alberti, K.G.M.M. (2000) `Multicentre Research Ethics Committees: Has the Cure been Worse than the Disease?', British Medical Journal 320: 1157—8.[Free Full Text]
  • Annas, J. (2006) `Virtue Ethics', in D. Copp (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, pp. 514—36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bently, C. and P. Enderby (2005) `Academic Medicine: Who is it For?', British Medical Journal 330: 61.[Free Full Text]
  • Bostock, L. (2002) `"God, She's Gonna Report Me": The Ethics of Child Protection in Poverty Research', Children and Society 16: 273—83.[CrossRef]
  • Cave, E. and S. Holm (2002) `New Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees: Is Facilitating Research Achieved at the Cost of Participants' Interests?', Journal of Medical Ethics 28: 318—21.
  • Central Office for Research Ethics Committees ( 2006) Implementing the Recommendations of the Ad-Hoc Advisory Group: Consultation. London: National Patient Safety Agency, DoH.
  • Cloke, P., P. Cooke, J. Cursons, P. Milbourne and R. Widdowfield (2000) `Ethics, Reflexivity and Research: Encounters with Homeless People', Ethics, Place and Environment 3(2): 133—54.[CrossRef]
  • Corrigan, O. (2003) `Empty Ethics: The Problem with Informed Consent ', Sociology of Health and Illness 25(3): 768—92.[CrossRef]
  • Denscombe, M. (2005) `Research Ethics and the Governance of Research Projects: The Potential of Internet Home Pages', Sociological Research Online 10(3), URL (consulted 10 October 2005): http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/3/denscombe.html
  • Department of Health (2004) The Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care: Implementation Plan for Social Care. London: DoH.
  • Department of Health (2005) Report of the Ad-Hoc Advisory Group on the Operation of NHS Research Ethics Committees. London: DoH.
  • Dolan, B. (1999) `The Impact of Local Research Ethics Committees on the Development of Nursing Knowledge', Journal of Advanced Nursing 30(5): 1009—10.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fischbacher, C., D. Chappel, R. Edwards and N. Summerton (2000) `Health Surveys via The Internet: Quick and Dirty or Rapid and Robust?', Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 93: 356—9.[Free Full Text]
  • Hannigan, B. and D. Allen (2003) `A Tale of Two Studies: Research Governance Issues Arising from Two Ethnographic Investigations into the Organisation of Health and Social Care', International Journal of Nursing Studies 40: 685—95.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hugman, R. (2003) `Professional Values and Ethics in Social Work: Reconsidering Postmodernism?', British Journal of Social Work 33(8): 1025—41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Jamrozik, K. (2000) `The Case for a New System for Oversight of Research on Human Subjects', Journal of Medical Ethics 26: 334—9.
  • Jamrozik, K. (2004) `Research Ethics Paperwork: What is the Plot We Seem to Have Lost?', British Medical Journal 329: 286—7.[Free Full Text]
  • Jones, A.M. and B. Bamford (2004) `The Other Face of Research Governance', British Medical Journal 329: 280—1.[Free Full Text]
  • Kimmel, A.J. (1988) Ethics and Values in Applied Social Research, pp. 42—50. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Malone, S. (2003) `Ethics at Home: Informed Consent in Your Own Backyard ', Qualitative Studies in Education 16(6): 797—815.[CrossRef]
  • Martin, P.M. and C. Glesne (2002) `From the Global Village to the Pluriverse? "Other" Ethics for Cross-Cultural Qualitative Research', Ethics, Place and Environment 5(3): 205—21.[CrossRef]
  • Miles, M.B. and A.M. Huberman (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, pp. 288—97. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • O'Neill, O. (2006) `Rethinking Informed Consent', 2006 Athena Lecture, Imperial College, May.
  • Parker, M., R. Ashcroft, A.O.M. Wilkie and A. Kent (2004) `Ethical Review of Research into Rare Genetic Disorders ', British Medical Journal 329: 288—9.[Free Full Text]
  • Payne, G. and M. Williams (2005) `Generalization in Qualitative Research', Sociology 39(2): 295—314.[Abstract]
  • Pickworth, E. (2000) `Should Local Research Ethics Committees Monitor Research They Have Approved?', Journal of Medical Ethics 26: 330—3.
  • Ramcharan, P. and J.R. Cutliffe (2001) `Judging the Ethics of Qualitative Research: Considering the "Ethics as Process" Model', Health and Social Care in the Community 9(6): 358—66.[CrossRef]
  • Seedhouse, D. (2002) `Commitment to Health: A Shared Ethical Bond Between Professions', Journal of Interprofessional Care 16(3): 249—60.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Sin, C.H. (2005) `Seeking Informed Consent: Reflections on Research Practice', Sociology 39(2): 277—94.[Abstract]
  • Soobrayan, V. (2003) `Ethics, Truth and Politics in Constructivist Qualitative Research', Westminster Studies in Education 26(2): 107—23.
  • Statutory Instrument 2004 No 1031. (2004) The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004. London: The Stationery Office.
  • Wald, D.S. (2004) `Bureaucracy of Ethics Applications', British Medical Journal 329: 282—4.[Free Full Text]
  • Ward, H.J.T., S.N. Cousens, B. Smith-Bathgate, M. Leitch, D. Everington, R.G. Will and P.G. Smith (2004) `Obstacles to Conducting Epidemiological Research in the UK General Population', British Medical Journal 329: 277—9.[Free Full Text]
  • Warlow, C. (2004) `Clinical Research Under the Cosh Again', British Medical Journal 329: 241—2.[Free Full Text]
  • Wiles, R., S. Heath, G. Crow and V. Charles (2005) Informed Consent in Social Research: A Literature Review. Southampton: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.

Sociology, Vol. 41, No. 6, 1115-1132 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038507082318


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SociologyHome page
K. Riach
Exploring Participant-centred Reflexivity in the Research Interview
Sociology, April 1, 2009; 43(2): 356 - 370.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
A. Hedgecoe
Research Ethics Review and the Sociological Research Relationship
Sociology, October 1, 2008; 42(5): 873 - 886.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
R. Aldred
Ethical and Political Issues in Contemporary Research Relationships
Sociology, October 1, 2008; 42(5): 887 - 903.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
D. Calvey
The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing `Situated Ethics' in the Field
Sociology, October 1, 2008; 42(5): 905 - 918.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, S.
Right arrow Articles by McMullan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?