This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Elliott, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Beck's Sociology of Risk: A Critical Assessment

University of the West of England Anthony.Elliott{at}uwe.ac.uk

The German sociologist Ulrich Beck has elaborated a highly original formulation of the theory of risk and reflexive modernization, a formulation that has had a significant impact upon recent sociological theorizing and research. This article examines Beck's sociology of risk in the context of his broader social theory of reflexvity, advanced modernization and individualization. The article argues that Beck's work is constrained by several sociological weaknesses: namely, a dependence upon objectivistic and instrumental models of the social construction of risk and uncertainty in social relations, and a failure to adequately define the relations between institutional dynamism on the one hand and self-referentiality and critical reflection on the other. As a contribution to the reformulation and further development of Beck's approach to sociological theory, the article seeks to suggest other ways in which the link between risk and reflexivity might be pursued. These include a focus upon 91) the intermixing of reflexivity and reflection in social relations; (2) contemporary ideologies of domination and power; and (3) a dialectical notion of modernity and postmodernization.

Key Words: domination • modernity • postmodernity • reflexivity • risk • social theory

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Donoghue Antisocial Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) in Britain: Contextualizing Risk and Reflexive Modernization Sociology, April 1, 2008; 42(2): 337 - 355. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. P. Hier Transformative democracy in the age of second modernity: cosmopolitanization, communicative agency and the reflexive subject New Media Society, February 1, 2008; 10(1): 27 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Mythen Reappraising the Risk Society Thesis: Telescopic Sight or Myopic Vision? Current Sociology, November 1, 2007; 55(6): 793 - 813. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Lewis DIY selves?: Reflexivity and habitus in young people's use of the internet for health information European Journal of Cultural Studies, November 1, 2006; 9(4): 461 - 479. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Campbell and G. Currie Against Beck: In Defence of Risk Analysis Philosophy of the Social Sciences, June 1, 2006; 36(2): 149 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Pick and K. Dayaram Reflexive Judgement, Risk and Responses: HIV/AIDS in Africa and Asia Journal of Human Values, April 1, 2006; 12(1): 55 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Low Managing Safety and Risk: The Experiences of People with Parkinson's Disease who Use Alternative and Complementary Therapies Health (London) , October 1, 2004; 8(4): 445 - 463. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Howe and C. Langdon Towards a Reflexive Planning Theory Planning Theory, November 1, 2002; 1(3): 209 - 225. [Abstract] [PDF]