Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Broom, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tovey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Dialectical Tension Between Individuation and Depersonalization in Cancer Patients' Mediation of Complementary, Alternative and Biomedical Cancer Treatments

Alex Broom

University of Newcastle, Australia, alexander.broom{at}newcastle.edu.au

Philip Tovey

University of Leeds, UK, p.a.tovey{at}leeds.ac.uk

Drawing on in-depth interviews with cancer patients, this article examines patients' perspectives on the nature of evidence and the degree to which different understandings of evidence inform decision-making about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and biomedical cancer treatments. Results illustrate the ways in which many cancer patients critically engage with questions about the nature of knowledge and the potential pitfalls of science.Their accounts can largely be characterized by a dialectical tension between individuation (espoused by many CAM therapies) and depersonalization (implicit in biomedical care); a tension mediated by individual cancer patient's prognosis and age. On the basis of the results we argue for a re-focusing of social theory to embrace an understanding of grass-roots ontological tensions seen in the experiences of individual cancer patients.The problematic nature of maintaining a narrowly defined `evidence-base' policy on CAM and cancer is also discussed in light of the data.

Key Words: cancer • complementary medicine • evidence-based medicine

Sociology, Vol. 41, No. 6, 1021-1039 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0038038507082313
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
A. Broom
Intuition, Subjectivity, and Le Bricoleur: Cancer Patients' Accounts of Negotiating a Plurality of Therapeutic Options
Qual Health Res, August 1, 2009; 19(8): 1050 - 1059.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health (London)Home page
A. Broom and J. Adams
Oncology clinicians' accounts of discussing complementary and alternative medicine with their patients
Health (London) , May 1, 2009; 13(3): 317 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
A. Broom and P. Tovey
Exploring the Temporal Dimension in Cancer Patients' Experiences of Nonbiomedical Therapeutics
Qual Health Res, December 1, 2008; 18(12): 1650 - 1661.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health (London)Home page
A. Broom and P. Tovey
The role of the Internet in cancer patients' engagement with complementary and alternative treatments
Health (London) , April 1, 2008; 12(2): 139 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]